Data, Analytics & AI

Generative AI Solutions

RAG, copilots, grounded LLMs.

Generative AI engineered into production — retrieval-augmented architectures, fine-tuned models, and copilot patterns grounded in your governed enterprise knowledge.

Our framework

The case

Generative AI is
an engineering problem.

Most enterprise GenAI failures aren't model failures. They're retrieval failures, eval failures, governance failures, integration failures. The model picks the words; the system picks whether the words are right, safe, and worth shipping.

We design GenAI as an engineered system — grounded retrieval, structured eval, observable behaviour, and the same release discipline you'd apply to any high-stakes platform. The model is one component. The architecture around it is the product.

If your copilot can't show its work, it isn't enterprise-ready. It's a demo.

Our framework

Four pillars
for a copilot you can defend.

01

Grounded

Every answer is traceable to a source the user can open. No source, no answer.

02

Bounded

Permissions, redaction, and content policy enforced before retrieval — not as a trailing safeguard.

03

Evaluated

Continuous eval suites that catch hallucination, regression, and prompt drift before users do.

04

Observable

Every prompt, retrieval, and generation is logged and replayable. Audit trails are first-class.

What we build

From RAG fundamentals
to fine-tuned copilots.

01

RAG architectures

Production-grade retrieval — chunking strategy, reranking, evaluation, and grounded citations users can verify.

02

Fine-tuning & alignment

Domain fine-tunes (LoRA, QLoRA, full) with eval suites, safety alignment, and guardrails specific to your operating risk.

03

Copilot patterns

Grounded copilots embedded in CRM, underwriting, claims, knowledge, and developer workflows — not standalone chat surfaces.

04

Eval & observability

LLM evaluation harnesses, hallucination scoring, prompt-drift detection, and continuous monitoring in production.

05

Vector & knowledge platforms

Engineered retrieval substrate — hybrid search, reranking, freshness, and multi-tenant isolation.

06

Safety & compliance layer

Content policy, PII redaction, jailbreak resistance, and regulator-ready audit trails engineered in.

Reference architecture

The RAG stack,
engineered in layers.

We treat the retrieval substrate, the model layer, and the safety plane as separate concerns — each independently testable and replaceable.

01

Knowledge plane

Layer 01

Source-of-truth content with freshness and provenance.

CMS connectors
SharePoint / Confluence
Document warehouses
Freshness policy
Source ranking
02

Retrieval substrate

Layer 02

Hybrid search, reranking, and tenant isolation.

Pinecone / Weaviate / pgvector
Hybrid BM25+dense
Cross-encoder rerank
Permission-aware retrieval
Caching
03

Model layer

Layer 03

Foundation-aware, fine-tune-aware, multi-vendor.

OpenAI / Anthropic
Open-weights (Llama, Mistral)
LoRA / QLoRA fine-tunes
Routing
Fallback chains
04

Safety plane

Layer 04

Policy enforcement before, during, and after generation.

PII redaction
Content policy
Jailbreak detection
Output filtering
Audit logging
05

Eval & observability

Layer 05

Continuous testing, replay debugging, hallucination scoring.

Eval harnesses
Hallucination metrics
Prompt registry
Replay tooling
Cost telemetry

Outcomes we engineer for

What grounded GenAI
actually moves.

−68%

Cycle time

Median quote-to-bind cycle reduction at a Tier-1 carrier when the underwriter copilot is grounded properly.

<2s

P95 latency

Typical end-to-end latency on a hardened RAG stack with hybrid retrieval and rerank.

100%

Citation coverage

Every response is traceable to a source. No source — no response.

Zero

Silent regressions

When eval is wired into CI, prompt and model regressions surface before they reach users.

Where this applies

Wherever expertise
is locked in documents.

GenAI fits anywhere the work is reading, drafting, summarizing, or reasoning over structured knowledge — which is most knowledge work, in most industries.

  • Insurance & Reinsurance
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Wealth Management
  • Legal & Professional Services
  • Healthcare Providers
  • Pharma & Life Sciences
  • Public Sector
  • Higher Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Energy & Utilities
  • Telecom & Media
  • Retail
  • B2B SaaS
  • Defense & Aerospace

Common questions

What teams ask
before greenlighting.

Do we need to fine-tune our own model?

Often no. Most enterprise GenAI value comes from retrieval, eval, and engineering discipline — not from fine-tuning. Fine-tuning is a tool, not a goal.

How do we keep this safe and compliant?

Safety is an architectural concern, not a feature. We engineer the safety plane — redaction, policy, audit, replay — alongside retrieval and generation, not bolted on later.

Will this lock us into one model vendor?

No. We engineer routing and fallback so the model layer is replaceable. Most clients run multi-vendor by month six.

How do you measure if it's actually working?

Decision-first eval. Every copilot has a measurable workflow KPI — cycle time, deflection, satisfaction — and a continuous eval suite that catches regressions before users do.

Start the conversation

From the demo
to a copilot you'd defend in audit.

Most clients start with one workflow, ship in 8–14 weeks, and expand from there. We'll help you find the right one.